Bureaucrats in the sex offender trade are "groomers" too!

A child won’t testify if they know their family member will get life in prison!

This is probably the most made statement among bureaucrats and agencies/government tax-paid employees I ever hear. But upon closer examination we will unlock the mystery of why those who are sex offender bureaucrats believe what they believe.

Here's a scenario for ya:

A seven year old little girl is being raped, and or molested by her "father." If this person was any other stranger we would call this "father" a pedophile, but in the world of social workers and prosecutors and some cops this "father" is considered a father of the victim-child. This is an important distinction to be made because there are two camps of sexual abusers (1) "Real" pedophiles (according to sex offender bureaucrats) and (2) Family members we can't call pedophiles, but behave like pedophiles--okay back to the scenario.

This "father" figure is molesting, and raping this little kid and all the while he is telling the innocent little child that if she tells anyone SHE will be taken away from her family. Pedophiles are notorious for threatening children with their lies, but we have to remember in bureaucracy terms this pedophile is a father. These threats are part of what'’s called "grooming." Anyway, she has been threatened with foster care. So the little girl has been molested and threatened with expulsion if even the mother of the victim finds out.

She goes to school and all of the kids are playing with dolls, and the little girl starts displaying behavior that is conducive to a child who has been raped or molested. The law demands that the teacher report her suspicions to the "authorities." The "authorities" have nothing but hearsay suspicions, but they proceed further with their investigation, and into the home walk the social workers. They bring the child into a separate room, and set her down and start talking to her like they are at her level. They ask her some questions that have nothing to do with why they are there so as to gain her trust, of course. Really? Do you really think a child who has been groomed by a person called "daddy" is really going to trust strangers? They ask her more questions and through their investigation they determine that the little girl has been molested.

What do the "authorities" do now? They come back to the house with more strangers, and a stuffed animal, and they remove the child INSTEAD of the "father" so everything the "father" has said has now come true. The "father" gets to stay in the house while the investigation goes on and the child is removed from the house and further more in some cases not all the children are removed just the one kid suspected of being abused. I never understood that!

The child is taken to a state doctor who gives the child a pelvic exam where the doctor discovers now that the child has bruising around her genitalia and her hymen is gone. Now, the investigators have physical evidence that "someone" has molested and raped this kid, but who? After a little while of more questioning they decide that it is the "father" and rightly so, the father did do it.

In walk the cops who arrest the father and haul him off to jail to await his due process. The kid is still in foster care so in her world what her "daddy" told her came true. In all of the mistrust and lies he perpetrated against this innocent kid the one truth he told was what would happen to HER if she told, and it did.

The prosecutor gets the evidence and tells the cops, "I have enough evidence to proceed with a trial."

Now the intense investigation starts with both prosecutors and defense attorneys along with child shrinks and counselors taking this kid into a separate room and questioning her. During the questioning process some adult tells the kid that the "father" will go to prison for life if she testifies against her "father."

Who told her this and why? Could this be part of the grooming process, but now is it the system who are the groomers?

"If you tell them they will take you away from your family," explains the pedophile--I mean "father."

"If you testify your 'daddy' will go to prison for life, and you'll never see him again," the defense attorney whispers.

"If you tell, honey, we won't have daddy to take care of us anymore, and I'll have to go to work," cries the mother, "and what will the neighbors think?"

The seven year old feels pressure from all sides to not tell. This is obvious. A concerned citizen steps in to try and make real change re: pedophiles and the crimes they commit by creating a law that says if you get convicted of a heinous sexual crime against a child you will go to prison for life and what do the bureaucrats say to me? The child won't testify if they know the "father" will go to prison for life!

Why would a kid know what the sentencing laws were unless an adult told her? Are we to withhold from creating tough sentencing laws for pedophiles, and let me remind you that fathers who rape, sodomize and molest their children ARE PEDOPHILES, because the kid won'’t testify if she knew there was a life sentence? That is ridiculous and what's even more ridiculous is that some adults who work with these victims believe that crap! They parrot this statement like breathing with out even thinking.

Let me also remind any prosecutor or cop who is reading this that you and many others know that the worse kind of evidence a prosecutor can have is witness testimony for all kinds of reasons which I won't go into here, but you know that that is a fact. So to not support an OSL because you believe that children won't testify on the one hand if they knew there was an OSL, and then proclaim that victim testimony is the worse kind of evidence on the other hand is schizophrenic.

There used to be a time when prosecutors actually found and presented evidence to a jury, the trier of fact, and the jury, actually concluded with their plea of guilty or not guilty. Now-a-days the prosecutors plea bargain everything because it is better to at least get them on something than nothing at all. Is this thinking always true?

This leads to the next dilemma which is a clogged and highly expensive court system because our dysfunctional government system is more interested in saving their jobs than actually being worth keeping around. Gee, think about it: the more offenders of all crimes go through the system the more your position is needed to deal with them.

Our system is full of groomers. Either we have a state filled with pedophile groomers or we have a government system filled with groomers trying to protect their assets instead of doing what's right!

Then when concerned Citizens come along who actually can think this through the government tries grooming the concerned Citizen. Well, you may think that will work with a kid, but it's not going to work for this American and Washington state Citizen!

If the prosecutors and cops have gathered their evidence and have done their job then they don't need that kid to testify and even if the kid does testify the testimony will either uphold the evidence or it won't!

The bottom line: We have bureaucrats involved with a "jobs creation program for the predator industrial complex that was deliberatly created so as to grow govenment and make these bureaucrats feel wanted." The more lenient the sentences are for these crimes the more these bureaucrat jobs are necessary so as to process the pedophiles through.

With a one strike law a pedophile who is convicted for kidnapping, rape, sodomy or molestation gets ONE trial and ONE sentence. Wow! If we actually got an OSL through I guess some bureaucrats might lose their jobs because the system is actually working.

Ya know some of you could actually work in the private sector as attorneys and private detectives and shrinks. You could do it ya know. Why are you so afraid to make a living that depends on you and not on big government and us taxpayers?